dashboardpaster.blogg.se

Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9
Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9






isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9
  1. Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9 code#
  2. Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9 password#
  3. Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9 download#

Your Window Layout, Virtual Files, etc should apply as expected. Configure each Character in ISBoxer Toolkit to use the Account-specific Game Profile, Export to Inner Space, and launch your team. Inner Space will see the launcher the same as if it were an official game launcher. Your Account-specific Game Profiles will then be configured to launch ISBoxer EVE Launcher for use as single-account launcher - which will directly launch exefile.exe. This last bit is important, because if you tell it to use the master Game Profile instead, it's going to look like an EVE client launched by Inner Space without ISBoxer. Set the drop-down box to "Launch EVE client directly". To integrate this into your ISBoxer 41 configuration, what you want to do is follow the instructions to generate Account-specific Game Profiles for each, enabling the "Perform launch from a new ISBoxer EVE Launcher instance" option, while leaving "Leave new ISBoxer EVE Launcher instance open after launch" disabled.

Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9 password#

At least the OP should have rolled a completely unmanaged executable (and that is something 90% of programmers will not get done securely either, including me) so I have to target his attempt specifically and it doesnt get blanket targetted by every password recovering malware out there. It's just silly to tout the security of the thing. What the OP has done here is great and a service to the community (even though the whole /ssotoken shebang has been recommended by Chribba all the way back in 2013).

Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9 code#

Yeah, basically everyone malicious that gains elevated code execution on your machine hooks into the SecureString Marshalling functions because when they are called they are always interesting. This is why SecureString inherits CriticalFinalizerObject and that wrapper removes that completely because the user didnt know anything about it. I would argue that the proper use of IDisposable in the code prevents your proposed attack. This is otherwise a helpful observation regarding GC, thank you.Īlso, if you have enough access to the machine to execute these proposed attacks, you probably have less complicated attack vectors :) The wrapper class has already wiped the data by the time garbage collection matters, via Dispose(). Just from a quick browse you are doing at least one thing wrong: Your wrapper class is not marked as critical for finalization I would not even have to circumvent memory protection, just nuke the process at the right time and I got your passwords in plaintext. As is best practice, indeed the exposure time is limited and SecureString keeps it encrypted while kept in memory. That's about the best anyone can reasonably hope for. All you do is limit the exposure time of the password value in memory. It is super dangerous to assume the passwords are safe from prying eyes just by using SecureString. ISBoxer EVE Launcher can be used with or without ISBoxer/Inner Space! (As shown in the screenshot, you can just click to "Launch Non-Inner Space")

Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9 download#

The download and instructions are available at the github link. People developing custom EVE Launchers may benefit immensely from forking this source code.

isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9

I will admit I have not looked at the source of many other EVE Launchers, but from discussions with people in IRC and browsing the source or having seen bits of others, I can say that they do make mistakes on their security implementation for example IsBridgeUp came up recently - IsBridgeUp stores account information encrypted, but then also stores the keys the encryption only serves to prevent a plaintext password from appearing in the file, not to stop an attacker from gaining access if he wants to. Even the official EVE Launcher indicates its login saving is insecure (ISBoxer EVE Launcher does not make the same security compromise). This can all be verified by other security experts by perusing the source code. Passwords are also never kept insecure in memory. Any passwords kept by ISBoxer EVE Launcher can only be stored if a Master Password is configured, which is then used to encrypt any stored passwords. Why use this one? Well, even if you don't use ISBoxer or Inner Space, this launcher will securely save your EVE account passwords (saving them is optional, see screenshot), and can multi-launch your EVE accounts. There are other custom open source EVE Launchers. forgetting accounts), and because ISBoxer users have relative difficulty launching their teams with the official launcher. But also because people have issues with the official EVE Launcher (e.g.








Isboxer eve launcher use direct x 9